[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBhkFmGfalw/GgTY@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 06:48:06 -0700
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, loongarch@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, loongson-kernel@...ts.loongnix.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] LoongArch: Provide kernel fpu functions
On Sat, Mar 11, 2023 at 04:10:44PM +0800, WANG Xuerui wrote:
> again, and making the loongarch FPU helpers GPL-only works for me. However
> there's probably another question that Ruoyao pointed out: do we want to
> mark the neon/altivec/s390x helpers GPL-only right away? IMO this particular
> feature is not inherently arch-specific (the same would have to happen for
> every arch with optionally enabled extra state and instructions, not limited
> to FPU actually) so availability of such feature should preferably be made
> symmetric over arches.
In general we should, and all new code most. For existing code please
contact the relevant maintainers first.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists