[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87cz529kni.ffs@tglx>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 16:41:37 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Gregory Price <gourry.memverge@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, oleg@...hat.com, avagin@...il.com,
peterz@...radead.org, luto@...nel.org, krisman@...labora.com,
corbet@....net, shuah@...nel.org,
Gregory Price <gregory.price@...verge.com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 1/3] syscall_user_dispatch: helper function to
operate on given task
Gregory!
On Wed, Mar 01 2023 at 15:58, Gregory Price wrote:
> +static int task_set_syscall_user_dispatch(struct task_struct *task, unsigned long mode,
> + unsigned long offset, unsigned long len,
> + char __user *selector)
> {
> switch (mode) {
> case PR_SYS_DISPATCH_OFF:
...
case PR_SYS_DISPATCH_ON:
if (selector && !access_ok(selector, sizeof(*selector)))
return -EFAULT;
I'm not seing how this can work on ARM64 when user pointer tagging is
enabled in the tracee, but not in the tracer. In such a case, if the
pointer is tagged, access_ok() will fail because access_ok() wont untag
it.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists