lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 21 Mar 2023 10:45:18 -0500
From:   Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-aspeed@...ts.ozlabs.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, andrew@...id.au, joel@....id.au,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, arnd@...db.de,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/4] eeprom: ee1004: Enable devices on multiple busses


On 3/21/23 10:39, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 10:17 AM Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
>> The driver previously prevented probing devices on more than one
>> bus due to locking constraints with the special page addresses. This
>> constraint can be removed by allocating a reference-counted bus
>> structure containing the lock, rather than using global variables.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Eddie James <eajames@...ux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/misc/eeprom/ee1004.c | 175 +++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>>   1 file changed, 106 insertions(+), 69 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/misc/eeprom/ee1004.c b/drivers/misc/eeprom/ee1004.c
>> index c8c6deb7ed89..950813821087 100644
>> --- a/drivers/misc/eeprom/ee1004.c
>> +++ b/drivers/misc/eeprom/ee1004.c
>> @@ -9,12 +9,15 @@
>>    * Copyright (C) 2008 Wolfram Sang, Pengutronix
>>    */
>>
>> +#include <linux/err.h>
>>   #include <linux/i2c.h>
>>   #include <linux/init.h>
>>   #include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/list.h>
>>   #include <linux/mod_devicetable.h>
>>   #include <linux/module.h>
>>   #include <linux/mutex.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> What do you need from here? I don't see anything.
>
> of_device.h is a mess of implicit includes which I'm currently trying
> to detangle. See the ~13 year old comment in it about removing
> of_platform.h include. When I'm done, pretty much only bus
> implementations should include of_device.h.


You're right, I mistakenly thought I needed it for of_device_id. I'll 
remove it in v3.

Thanks,

Eddie


>
> Rob

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ