[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBnzEY2PLbUtMKqX@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 11:10:25 -0700
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Yangtao Li <frank.li@...o.com>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@...gle.com>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/drop_caches: move drop_caches sysctls into its own
file
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 05:19:18PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 09:56:03AM -0700, Luis Chamberlain wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 04:42:32PM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > > On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 09:09:07PM +0800, Yangtao Li wrote:
> > > > +static struct ctl_table drop_caches_table[] = {
> > > > + {
> > > > + .procname = "drop_caches",
> > > > + .data = &sysctl_drop_caches,
> > > > + .maxlen = sizeof(int),
> > > > + .mode = 0200,
> > > > + .proc_handler = drop_caches_sysctl_handler,
> > > > + .extra1 = SYSCTL_ONE,
> > > > + .extra2 = SYSCTL_FOUR,
> > > > + },
> > > > + {}
> > > > +};
> > >
> > > Could we avoid doing this until we no longer need an entire zero entry
> > > after the last one?
> >
> > That may be 2-3 kernel release from now. The way to use ARRAY_SIZE()
> > really is to deprecate the crap APIs that allow messy directory sysctl
> > structures.
>
> I'm OK with waiting another year to commence this cleanup. We've lived
> with the giant tables for decades already. Better to get the new API
> right than split the tables now, then have to touch all the places
> again.
We can do that sure.
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists