linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] arm64: Support CMDLINE

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <10ecb85e-232a-4176-bca5-6c393200b291@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 21 Mar 2023 19:06:54 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     Chris Packham <chris.packham@...iedtelesis.co.nz>,
        catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Support CMDLINE_EXTEND

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 11:19:55AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:

> We deliberately dropped support for CMDLINE_EXTEND in commit:

>   cae118b6acc3 ("arm64: Drop support for CMDLINE_EXTEND")

> ... which was mentioned the last time somone tried to re-add it:

>   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/ZAh8dWvbNkVQT11C@arm.com/

> Has something changes such that those issues no longer apply? If so, please
> call that out explicitly in the commit message. If not, I do not think we
> should take this patch.

Given that there have been multiple attempts to readd it is it worth
documenting this in the code?

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)