[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=wi2yeuwCxvB18=AWG+YKnMgd28WGkHFMqTyMA=59cw3rg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 12:21:54 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>,
Bharath SM <bharathsm@...rosoft.com>,
Shyam Prasad N <nspmangalore@...il.com>,
Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>,
Robbie Harwood <rharwood@...hat.com>,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
keyrings@...r.kernel.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] keys: Miscellaneous fixes/changes
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 12:16 PM Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk> wrote:
>
> I haven't seen the patch yet as it hasn't been pushed,
Well, it went out a couple of minutes before your email, so it's out now.
> It may make sense to add some debug check for
> PF_KTHREAD having TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME set, or task_work pending for that
> matter, as that is generally not workable without doing something to
> handle it explicitly.
Yeah, I guess we could have some generic check for that. I'm not sure
where it would be. Scheduler?
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists