linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20230322093531.7ac8d09e@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:   Wed, 22 Mar 2023 09:35:31 +1100
From:   Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:     Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com>
Cc:     Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the bpf-next tree

Hi all,

On Mon, 20 Mar 2023 13:07:23 +0100 Alexander Lobakin <aleksander.lobakin@...el.com> wrote:
>
> > After merging the bpf-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
> > ppc64_defconfig) failed like this:
> > 
> > net/bpf/test_run.c: In function 'frame_was_changed':
> > net/bpf/test_run.c:224:22: error: 'const struct xdp_page_head' has no member named 'frm'; did you mean 'frame'?
> >   224 |         return head->frm.data != head->orig_ctx.data ||
> >       |                      ^~~
> >       |                      frame
> > net/bpf/test_run.c:225:22: error: 'const struct xdp_page_head' has no member named 'frm'; did you mean 'frame'?
> >   225 |                head->frm.flags != head->orig_ctx.flags;
> >       |                      ^~~
> >       |                      frame  
> 
> The correct solution is to change `frm.` with `frame->`, but I hope the
> BPF maintainers will merge bpf into bpf-next to pick up fixes and
> changes like this :)

Well, that hasn't happened yet, so I will apply the following patch
until it does.

From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 09:20:26 +1100
Subject: [PATCH] bpf, test_run: fix up for "bpf, test_run: fix &xdp_frame misplacement for LIVE_FRAMES"

ineracting with commit

  e5995bc7e2ba ("bpf, test_run: fix crashes due to XDP frame overwriting/corruption")

Signed-off-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
---
 net/bpf/test_run.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/bpf/test_run.c b/net/bpf/test_run.c
index af5804d6bff2..c2bab8e20406 100644
--- a/net/bpf/test_run.c
+++ b/net/bpf/test_run.c
@@ -221,8 +221,8 @@ static bool frame_was_changed(const struct xdp_page_head *head)
 	 * i.e. has the highest chances to be overwritten. If those two are
 	 * untouched, it's most likely safe to skip the context reset.
 	 */
-	return head->frm.data != head->orig_ctx.data ||
-	       head->frm.flags != head->orig_ctx.flags;
+	return head->frame->data != head->orig_ctx.data ||
+	       head->frame->flags != head->orig_ctx.flags;
 }
 
 static bool ctx_was_changed(struct xdp_page_head *head)
-- 
2.39.2

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped