[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABVgOSnfMXd4Q=GXvq8Ma26wpaM6E=LOYLxXn83YQEV-Yn2sBg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 12:02:30 +0800
From: David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux@...ck-us.net, shuah@...nel.org,
patches@...nelci.org, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
jonathanh@...dia.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com, srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5.10 00/99] 5.10.176-rc1 review
On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 at 03:41, Pavel Machek <pavel@...x.de> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 5.10.176 release.
> > There are 99 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > let me know.
> >
>
> > David Gow <davidgow@...gle.com>
> > rust: arch/um: Disable FP/SIMD instruction to match x86
>
> Why is this patch here? It does not make sense for stable, it was only
> in AUTOSEL for less than a week, and I already explained why it is
> bad.
>
> "git grep KBUILD_RUSTFLAGS" if in doubt.
I agree: let's exclude this patch from -stable.
While the CFLAGS part of it is still _technically_ valid without Rust,
it turns out it triggers a bug in gcc <11, so is probably best
avoided. See:
- https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99652
- https://lore.kernel.org/linux-um/20230318041555.4192172-1-davidgow@google.com/
Cheers,
-- David
>
> Best regards,
> Pavel
> --
> DENX Software Engineering GmbH, Managing Director: Wolfgang Denk
> HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Download attachment "smime.p7s" of type "application/pkcs7-signature" (4003 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists