lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 20 Mar 2023 22:23:41 -0700
From:   Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc:     Petr Pavlu <petr.pavlu@...e.com>, tglx@...utronix.de,
        mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
        x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com, ndesaulniers@...gle.com,
        trix@...hat.com, corbet@....net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] x86: Avoid relocation information in final vmlinux

On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 01:12:07PM -0700, Dave Hansen wrote:
> On 3/20/23 05:10, Petr Pavlu wrote:
> > The issue is then that the collected vmlinux file and hence distribution
> > packages end up unnecessarily large because of this extra data. The
> > following is a size comparison of vmlinux v6.0 with and without the
> > relocation information:
> > | Configuration      | With relocs | Stripped relocs |
> > | x86_64_defconfig   |       70 MB |           43 MB |
> > | +CONFIG_DEBUG_INFO |      818 MB |          367 MB |
> > 
> > Optimize a resulting vmlinux by adding a postlink step that splits the
> > relocation information into vmlinux.relocs and then strips it from the
> > vmlinux binary.
> 
> When I saw that this adds a postlink step, I read that as, "adds another
> step to the unbearably slow single-threaded part of kernel builds". :)
> 
> But, here's one data point that made me feel a lot better.  Using a
> random .config:
> 
> > https://sr71.net/~dave/intel/config-reloctest
> 
> the builds get a _bit_ slower, going from 37.0s->37.7s.  This is pretty
> arbitrary of course, using my compiler on my hardware, so YMMV.  But,
> for me, this seems like a reasonable tradeoff given the space savings.
> 
> I'd be curious what other people are seeing.

I am seeing a negligible difference (~1%) with LLVM 16 when targeting
the following configuration combinations and building the 'bzImage'
target.

* allmodconfig:

Benchmark 1: v6.3-rc3
  Time (mean ± σ):     93.370 s ±  0.313 s    [User: 3462.570 s, System: 371.420 s]
  Range (min … max):   92.993 s … 93.659 s    5 runs

Benchmark 2: v6.3-rc3 + "x86: Avoid relocation information in final vmlinux"
  Time (mean ± σ):     93.539 s ±  0.193 s    [User: 3464.361 s, System: 370.709 s]
  Range (min … max):   93.281 s … 93.816 s    5 runs

Summary
  'v6.3-rc3' ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than 'v6.3-rc3 + "x86: Avoid relocation information in final vmlinux"'

* allmodconfig + debug info (DWARF5):

Benchmark 1: v6.3-rc3
  Time (mean ± σ):     97.952 s ±  0.451 s    [User: 3673.380 s, System: 378.814 s]
  Range (min … max):   97.420 s … 98.568 s    5 runs

Benchmark 2: v6.3-rc3 + "x86: Avoid relocation information in final vmlinux"
  Time (mean ± σ):     98.302 s ±  1.050 s    [User: 3674.310 s, System: 378.323 s]
  Range (min … max):   97.603 s … 100.152 s    5 runs

Summary
  'v6.3-rc3' ran
    1.00 ± 0.01 times faster than 'v6.3-rc3 + "x86: Avoid relocation information in final vmlinux"'

* allyesconfig bzImage:

Benchmark 1: v6.3-rc3
  Time (mean ± σ):     674.232 s ±  1.581 s    [User: 24901.883 s, System: 2223.728 s]
  Range (min … max):   672.478 s … 676.678 s    5 runs

Benchmark 2: v6.3-rc3 + "x86: Avoid relocation information in final vmlinux"
  Time (mean ± σ):     679.783 s ±  2.454 s    [User: 24903.720 s, System: 2228.943 s]
  Range (min … max):   676.369 s … 682.772 s    5 runs

Summary
  'v6.3-rc3' ran
    1.01 ± 0.00 times faster than 'v6.3-rc3 + "x86: Avoid relocation information in final vmlinux"'

* allyesconfig + debug info (DWARF5):

Benchmark 1: v6.3-rc3
  Time (mean ± σ):     709.745 s ±  1.880 s    [User: 26570.531 s, System: 2304.563 s]
  Range (min … max):   707.918 s … 712.818 s    5 runs

Benchmark 2: v6.3-rc3 + "x86: Avoid relocation information in final vmlinux"
  Time (mean ± σ):     711.773 s ±  1.152 s    [User: 26571.973 s, System: 2307.176 s]
  Range (min … max):   710.127 s … 713.224 s    5 runs

Summary
  'v6.3-rc3' ran
    1.00 ± 0.00 times faster than 'v6.3-rc3 + "x86: Avoid relocation information in final vmlinux"'

Cheers,
Nathan

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ