[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBlDaMh023N20uuo@bombadil.infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2023 22:40:56 -0700
From: Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jiaqi Yan <jiaqiyan@...gle.com>,
Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the sysctl tree with Linus' tree
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 01:22:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:20:52 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the sysctl tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > mm/memory-failure.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 44b8f8bf2438 ("mm: memory-failure: add memory failure stats to sysfs")
> >
> > from Linus' tree and commit:
> >
> > cfe7e6ea5ee2 ("mm: memory-failure: Move memory failure sysctls to its own file")
> >
> > from the sysctl tree.
> >
> > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> > complex conflicts.
>
> Sorry, I forgot the resolution - see below.
Oh sorry, its on Linus' tree, so I can just rebase too. Did that and
addressed the conflict as you did, thanks!
Luis
Powered by blists - more mailing lists