[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <40e3acac-b58a-7af8-b025-3678f84434da@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 07:43:22 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Arınç ÜNAL <arinc.unal@...nc9.com>,
Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>
Cc: linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, john@...ozen.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/10] dt: bindings: clock: add mtmips SoCs clock device
tree binding documentation
On 21/03/2023 07:38, Arınç ÜNAL wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Ah, but indeed there are newer Mediatek MT6xxx and MT8xxx SoCs which are
>>>> ARM, so mediatek,mtmips-sysc would work.
>>>
>>> I can use 'mediatek,mtmips-sysc.yaml' as the name but compatibles will
>>> start with ralink. There are already some existent compatibles for
>>> mt762x already having ralink as prefix, so to be coherent ralink
>>> should be maintained as prefix.
>>
>> The compatibles I mentioned start already with mediatek, so why do you
>> want to introduce incorrect vendor name for these?
>
> Can you point out where these compatible strings for mt7620 and mt7628 are?
git grep
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists