linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] dt-bindings: clock: add mtmips SoCs system controller

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0ece990e-fd81-856a-bd0e-8a2572448aa3@linaro.org>
Date:   Tue, 21 Mar 2023 08:16:50 +0100
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To:     Sergio Paracuellos <sergio.paracuellos@...il.com>
Cc:     linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
        tsbogend@...ha.franken.de, john@...ozen.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, p.zabel@...gutronix.de,
        mturquette@...libre.com, sboyd@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, arinc.unal@...nc9.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] dt-bindings: clock: add mtmips SoCs system
 controller

On 21/03/2023 08:00, Sergio Paracuellos wrote:
>>> +properties:
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    items:
>>> +      - enum:
>>> +          - ralink,mt7620-sysc
>>
>> Since you decided to send it before we finish discussion:
>> NAK - this is already used as mediatek
> 
> Sorry, there was too much stuff commented so I preferred to clean up
> all of them while maintaining the compatibles with the ralink prefix
> instead since that was where the current discussion was at that point.

You did not even wait for me to send feedback on this, in old thread.

> 
>>
>>> +          - ralink,mt7620a-sysc
> 
> As I have said, this one exists:
> 
> arch/mips/ralink/mt7620.c:      rt_sysc_membase =
> plat_of_remap_node("ralink,mt7620a-sysc");

And why do you ignore others which have mediatek?

> 
> 
>>> +          - ralink,mt7628-sysc
>>
>> Same here.

Same problem.

>>
>>> +          - ralink,mt7688-sysc
>>
>> I expect you to check the others.
> 
> I can change others to mediatek but that would be a bit weird, don't you think?

No, I expect to have mediatek where the model is already used with
mediatek prefix.



Best regards,
Krzysztof