linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 6/7 v5] sh: fix Kconfig entry for NUMA => SMP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAMuHMdXnbRvCjtgpbMnUVoRbHSk407t7Sr4XPpoiaE7M1h+4Ng@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 21 Mar 2023 08:55:21 +0100
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@...sik.fu-berlin.de>,
        Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
        Rich Felker <dalias@...c.org>,
        Kuninori Morimoto <morimoto.kuninori@...esas.com>,
        linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/7 v5] sh: fix Kconfig entry for NUMA => SMP

Hi Randy,

Thanks for your patch!

On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 12:13 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> Fix SUPERH builds that select SYS_SUPPORTS_NUMA but do not select
> SYS_SUPPORTS_SMP and SMP.

Perhaps because these SoCs do not support SMP?

> kernel/sched/topology.c is only built for CONFIG_SMP and then the NUMA
> code + data inside topology.c is only built when CONFIG_NUMA is
> set/enabled, so these arch/sh/ configs need to select SMP and
> SYS_SUPPORTS_SMP to build the NUMA support.
>
> Fixes this build error in multiple SUPERH configs:
>
> mm/page_alloc.o: In function `get_page_from_freelist':
> page_alloc.c:(.text+0x2ca8): undefined reference to `node_reclaim_distance'
>
> Fixes: 357d59469c11 ("sh: Tidy up dependencies for SH-2 build.")
> Fixes: 9109a30e5a54 ("sh: add support for sh7366 processor")
> Fixes: 55ba99eb211a ("sh: Add support for SH7786 CPU subtype.")
> Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>

> --- a/arch/sh/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/sh/Kconfig
> @@ -442,6 +442,8 @@ config CPU_SUBTYPE_SH7785
>         select CPU_SHX2
>         select ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE
>         select SYS_SUPPORTS_NUMA
> +       select SYS_SUPPORTS_SMP
> +       select SMP

SH7785 is single-core.

>         select PINCTRL
>
>  config CPU_SUBTYPE_SH7786
> @@ -476,6 +478,8 @@ config CPU_SUBTYPE_SH7722
>         select CPU_SHX2
>         select ARCH_SHMOBILE
>         select ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE
> +       select SYS_SUPPORTS_SMP
> +       select SMP

SH7722 is single-core.

>         select SYS_SUPPORTS_NUMA
>         select SYS_SUPPORTS_SH_CMT
>         select PINCTRL
> @@ -486,6 +490,8 @@ config CPU_SUBTYPE_SH7366
>         select CPU_SHX2
>         select ARCH_SHMOBILE
>         select ARCH_SPARSEMEM_ENABLE
> +       select SYS_SUPPORTS_SMP
> +       select SMP

Dunno about this one (no public info available).

>         select SYS_SUPPORTS_NUMA
>         select SYS_SUPPORTS_SH_CMT

Wasn't this fixed by commit 61bb6cd2f765b90c ("mm: move
node_reclaim_distance to fix NUMA without SMP") in v5.16?

It is not sufficient, after that you run into:

    mm/slab.c: In function ‘slab_memory_callback’:
    mm/slab.c:1127:23: error: implicit declaration of function
‘init_cache_node_node’; did you mean ‘drain_cache_node_node’?
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     1127 |                 ret = init_cache_node_node(nid);

which you reported before in
https://lore.kernel.org/all/b5bdea22-ed2f-3187-6efe-0c72330270a4@infradead.org/

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert


--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds