[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e3644e19-7453-440b-00dc-781104ca83cf@foss.st.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 10:00:03 +0100
From: Arnaud POULIQUEN <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>
To: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
<andersson@...nel.org>
CC: <shawnguo@...nel.org>, <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
<kernel@...gutronix.de>, <festevam@...il.com>, <linux-imx@....com>,
<patrice.chotard@...s.st.com>, <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
<alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com>, <arnaud.pouliquen@...com>,
<hongxing.zhu@....com>, <peng.fan@....com>,
<shengjiu.wang@....com>, <linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/5] remoteproc: stm32: Call of_node_put() on iteration
error
Hi Mathieu,
On 3/20/23 23:18, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Function of_phandle_iterator_next() calls of_node_put() on the last
> device_node it iterated over, but when the loop exits prematurely it has
> to be called explicitly>
> Fixes: 13140de09cc2 ("remoteproc: stm32: add an ST stm32_rproc driver")
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>
> ---
> drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c | 6 +++++-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> index 7d782ed9e589..23c1690b8d73 100644
> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/stm32_rproc.c
> @@ -223,11 +223,13 @@ static int stm32_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
> while (of_phandle_iterator_next(&it) == 0) {
> rmem = of_reserved_mem_lookup(it.node);
> if (!rmem) {
> + of_node_put(it.node);
> dev_err(dev, "unable to acquire memory-region\n");
> return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> if (stm32_rproc_pa_to_da(rproc, rmem->base, &da) < 0) {
> + of_node_put(it.node);
> dev_err(dev, "memory region not valid %pa\n",
> &rmem->base);
> return -EINVAL;
> @@ -254,8 +256,10 @@ static int stm32_rproc_prepare(struct rproc *rproc)
> it.node->name);
> }
>
> - if (!mem)
> + if (!mem) {
> + of_node_put(it.node);
> return -ENOMEM;
> + }
Good catch!
Looking in code I don't see that we call of_node_put() when we release the
carveouts.
Please tell me if I'm wrong but look to me that we should also call of_node_put()
in mem->release() op, in drivers.
This one remains valid.
reviewed-by: Arnaud Pouliquen <arnaud.pouliquen@...s.st.com>
Thanks,
Arnaud
>
> rproc_add_carveout(rproc, mem);
> index++;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists