[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230321122846.GK2234901@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:28:46 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: mingo@...hat.com, juri.lelli@...hat.com, dietmar.eggemann@....com,
rostedt@...dmis.org, bsegall@...gle.com, mgorman@...e.de,
bristot@...hat.com, vschneid@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, zhangqiao22@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] sched/fair: sanitize vruntime of entity being migrated
On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 05:08:10PM +0100, Vincent Guittot wrote:
> Commit 829c1651e9c4 ("sched/fair: sanitize vruntime of entity being placed")
> fixes an overflowing bug, but ignore a case that se->exec_start is reset
> after a migration.
>
> For fixing this case, we delay the reset of se->exec_start after
> placing the entity which se->exec_start to detect long sleeping task.
>
> In order to take into account a possible divergence between the clock_task
> of 2 rqs, we increase the threshold to around 104 days.
>
>
> Fixes: 829c1651e9c4 ("sched/fair: sanitize vruntime of entity being placed")
> Signed-off-by: Zhang Qiao <zhangqiao22@...wei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Just noticed, that SoB chain isn't valid, should Zhang be something
like: Originally-by or Suggested-by or whatever?
Powered by blists - more mailing lists