[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230321124646.GM2234901@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 13:46:46 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@...utronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, John Stultz <jstultz@...gle.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/18] timer: Move from a push remote at enqueue to a
pull at expiry model
On Wed, Mar 01, 2023 at 03:17:26PM +0100, Anna-Maria Behnsen wrote:
> quater of the remaining CPUs was kept busy. This measurement was repeated
/me hands you a bucket of spare 'r' :-)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists