[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ac5f5bf8-0fa9-3e93-80ec-bba20a615bfe@amd.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 10:09:09 -0500
From: "Moger, Babu" <babu.moger@....com>
To: Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>, corbet@....net,
tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de
Cc: fenghua.yu@...el.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, x86@...nel.org,
hpa@...or.com, paulmck@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
quic_neeraju@...cinc.com, rdunlap@...radead.org,
damien.lemoal@...nsource.wdc.com, songmuchun@...edance.com,
peterz@...radead.org, jpoimboe@...nel.org, pbonzini@...hat.com,
chang.seok.bae@...el.com, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
jmattson@...gle.com, daniel.sneddon@...ux.intel.com,
sandipan.das@....com, tony.luck@...el.com, james.morse@....com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bagasdotme@...il.com, eranian@...gle.com,
christophe.leroy@...roup.eu, jarkko@...nel.org,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, quic_jiles@...cinc.com,
peternewman@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 7/7] x86/resctrl: Add debug files when mounted with
debug option
On 3/15/23 13:45, Reinette Chatre wrote:
> Hi Babu,
>
> On 3/2/2023 12:25 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
>> Add the debug files to the resctrl hierarchy.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Babu Moger <babu.moger@....com>
>> ---
>> arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> index a1f13715a65c..790c6b9f9031 100644
>> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/resctrl/rdtgroup.c
>> @@ -2400,6 +2400,45 @@ static int mkdir_mondata_all(struct kernfs_node *parent_kn,
>> struct rdtgroup *prgrp,
>> struct kernfs_node **mon_data_kn);
>>
>> +void resctrl_add_debug_file(struct kernfs_node *parent_kn, const char *config,
>> + unsigned long fflags)
>> +{
>> + struct rftype *rft;
>> +
>> + rft = rdtgroup_get_rftype_by_name(config);
>> + if (rft) {
>> + rft->fflags |= fflags;
>> + rdtgroup_add_file(parent_kn, rft);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void resctrl_add_debug_files(void)
>> +{
>> + resctrl_add_debug_file(rdtgroup_default.kn, "rmid", RFTYPE_BASE);
>> + resctrl_add_debug_file(rdtgroup_default.kn, "closid", RFTYPE_BASE_CTRL);
>> + kernfs_activate(rdtgroup_default.kn);
>> +}
>> +
>
> I think that separating this from all the other resctrl file creation
> can be a source of confusion and bugs. Why not add the debug files
> at the same time as all the other files belonging to a resource group?
>
> How about introducing new flags, perhaps RFTYPE_MON_DEBUG and
> RFTYPE_CTRL_DEBUG. When the debug option is enabled (when resctrl_debug
> is true) then the appropriate flag can be OR'd with the other flags
> before rdtgroup_add_files() is called.
Yes. I could try that.
>
> It sounds to me if there are plans to add more of these files. A function
> like resctrl_add_debug_files() requires a lot of changes and care (and thus
> potential for errors) every time a new debug file is added.
>
> On another note ... what are the plans with this debug area? At some
> point it may be better to expand resctrl debugfs.
Hmm.. I have not thought about that.
--
Thanks
Babu Moger
Powered by blists - more mailing lists