| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <167950458385.5837.2205725754203915953.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 17:03:03 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Kirill A. Shutemov" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/mm] selftests/x86/lam: Add test cases for LAM vs thread creation
The following commit has been merged into the x86/mm branch of tip:
Commit-ID: dfd7a1569e25996575a24725b64f73162155bcd6
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/dfd7a1569e25996575a24725b64f73162155bcd6
Author: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Sun, 12 Mar 2023 14:26:12 +03:00
Committer: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
CommitterDate: Thu, 16 Mar 2023 13:08:41 -07:00
selftests/x86/lam: Add test cases for LAM vs thread creation
LAM enabling is only allowed when the process has single thread.
LAM mode is inherited into child thread.
Trying to enable LAM after spawning a thread has to fail.
Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230312112612.31869-18-kirill.shutemov%40linux.intel.com
---
tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c | 92 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 92 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c
index a8c9182..eb0e469 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/x86/lam.c
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
@@ -12,6 +13,7 @@
#include <sys/stat.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <inttypes.h>
+#include <sched.h>
#include <sys/uio.h>
#include <linux/io_uring.h>
@@ -50,6 +52,8 @@
#define PAGE_SIZE (4 << 10)
+#define STACK_SIZE 65536
+
#define barrier() ({ \
__asm__ __volatile__("" : : : "memory"); \
})
@@ -731,6 +735,75 @@ static int handle_inheritance(struct testcases *test)
return 0;
}
+static int thread_fn_get_lam(void *arg)
+{
+ return get_lam();
+}
+
+static int thread_fn_set_lam(void *arg)
+{
+ struct testcases *test = arg;
+
+ return set_lam(test->lam);
+}
+
+static int handle_thread(struct testcases *test)
+{
+ char stack[STACK_SIZE];
+ int ret, child_ret;
+ int lam = 0;
+ pid_t pid;
+
+ /* Set LAM mode in parent process */
+ if (!test->later) {
+ lam = test->lam;
+ if (set_lam(lam) != 0)
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ pid = clone(thread_fn_get_lam, stack + STACK_SIZE,
+ SIGCHLD | CLONE_FILES | CLONE_FS | CLONE_VM, NULL);
+ if (pid < 0) {
+ perror("Clone failed.");
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ waitpid(pid, &child_ret, 0);
+ ret = WEXITSTATUS(child_ret);
+
+ if (lam != ret)
+ return 1;
+
+ if (test->later) {
+ if (set_lam(test->lam) != 0)
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int handle_thread_enable(struct testcases *test)
+{
+ char stack[STACK_SIZE];
+ int ret, child_ret;
+ int lam = test->lam;
+ pid_t pid;
+
+ pid = clone(thread_fn_set_lam, stack + STACK_SIZE,
+ SIGCHLD | CLONE_FILES | CLONE_FS | CLONE_VM, test);
+ if (pid < 0) {
+ perror("Clone failed.");
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+ waitpid(pid, &child_ret, 0);
+ ret = WEXITSTATUS(child_ret);
+
+ if (lam != ret)
+ return 1;
+
+ return 0;
+}
static void run_test(struct testcases *test, int count)
{
int i, ret = 0;
@@ -849,6 +922,25 @@ static struct testcases inheritance_cases[] = {
{
.expected = 0,
.lam = LAM_U57_BITS,
+ .test_func = handle_thread,
+ .msg = "THREAD: LAM_U57, child thread should get LAM mode same as parent\n",
+ },
+ {
+ .expected = 1,
+ .lam = LAM_U57_BITS,
+ .test_func = handle_thread_enable,
+ .msg = "THREAD: [NEGATIVE] Enable LAM in child.\n",
+ },
+ {
+ .expected = 1,
+ .later = 1,
+ .lam = LAM_U57_BITS,
+ .test_func = handle_thread,
+ .msg = "THREAD: [NEGATIVE] Enable LAM in parent after thread created.\n",
+ },
+ {
+ .expected = 0,
+ .lam = LAM_U57_BITS,
.test_func = handle_execve,
.msg = "EXECVE: LAM_U57, child process should get disabled LAM mode\n",
},
Powered by blists - more mailing lists