[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <0b841161-1fd2-584e-4920-40644b4b4a7e@sberdevices.ru>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 21:35:22 +0300
From: Arseniy Krasnov <avkrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@...hat.com>,
Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Bobby Eshleman <bobby.eshleman@...edance.com>
CC: <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<kernel@...rdevices.ru>, <oxffffaa@...il.com>,
<avkrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
Subject: [RFC PATCH v5 1/2] virtio/vsock: allocate multiple skbuffs on tx
This adds small optimization for tx path: instead of allocating single
skbuff on every call to transport, allocate multiple skbuff's until
credit space allows, thus trying to send as much as possible data without
return to af_vsock.c.
Signed-off-by: Arseniy Krasnov <AVKrasnov@...rdevices.ru>
Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@...hat.com>
---
net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++------
1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
index 6564192e7f20..9e87c7d4d7cf 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
@@ -196,7 +196,8 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
const struct virtio_transport *t_ops;
struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs;
u32 pkt_len = info->pkt_len;
- struct sk_buff *skb;
+ u32 rest_len;
+ int ret;
info->type = virtio_transport_get_type(sk_vsock(vsk));
@@ -216,10 +217,6 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
vvs = vsk->trans;
- /* we can send less than pkt_len bytes */
- if (pkt_len > VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE)
- pkt_len = VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE;
-
/* virtio_transport_get_credit might return less than pkt_len credit */
pkt_len = virtio_transport_get_credit(vvs, pkt_len);
@@ -227,17 +224,49 @@ static int virtio_transport_send_pkt_info(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
if (pkt_len == 0 && info->op == VIRTIO_VSOCK_OP_RW)
return pkt_len;
- skb = virtio_transport_alloc_skb(info, pkt_len,
- src_cid, src_port,
- dst_cid, dst_port);
- if (!skb) {
- virtio_transport_put_credit(vvs, pkt_len);
- return -ENOMEM;
- }
+ rest_len = pkt_len;
+
+ do {
+ struct sk_buff *skb;
+ size_t skb_len;
+
+ skb_len = min_t(u32, VIRTIO_VSOCK_MAX_PKT_BUF_SIZE, rest_len);
+
+ skb = virtio_transport_alloc_skb(info, skb_len,
+ src_cid, src_port,
+ dst_cid, dst_port);
+ if (!skb) {
+ ret = -ENOMEM;
+ break;
+ }
- virtio_transport_inc_tx_pkt(vvs, skb);
+ virtio_transport_inc_tx_pkt(vvs, skb);
- return t_ops->send_pkt(skb);
+ ret = t_ops->send_pkt(skb);
+ if (ret < 0)
+ break;
+
+ /* Both virtio and vhost 'send_pkt()' returns 'skb_len',
+ * but for reliability use 'ret' instead of 'skb_len'.
+ * Also if partial send happens (e.g. 'ret' != 'skb_len')
+ * somehow, we break this loop, but account such returned
+ * value in 'virtio_transport_put_credit()'.
+ */
+ rest_len -= ret;
+
+ if (WARN_ONCE(ret != skb_len,
+ "'send_pkt()' returns %i, but %zu expected\n",
+ ret, skb_len))
+ break;
+ } while (rest_len);
+
+ virtio_transport_put_credit(vvs, rest_len);
+
+ /* Return number of bytes, if any data has been sent. */
+ if (rest_len != pkt_len)
+ ret = pkt_len - rest_len;
+
+ return ret;
}
static bool virtio_transport_inc_rx_pkt(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs,
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists