linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf/core: Fix the same task check in perf_event_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <72b9cb37-dc6b-a802-2506-693c75180434@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Mar 2023 15:17:00 -0400
From:   "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:     alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, ak@...ux.intel.com,
        nadav.amit@...il.com,
        Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
        jolsa@...nel.org, Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        mingo@...hat.com, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
        Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>,
        "linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org" <linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf/core: Fix the same task check in
 perf_event_set_output



On 2023-03-22 10:15 a.m., Adrian Hunter wrote:
> On 22/03/23 15:42, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 12:59:28PM +0200, Adrian Hunter wrote:
>>> On 11/07/22 21:07, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com wrote:
>>>> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
>>>>
>>>> With the --per-thread option, perf record errors out when sampling with
>>>> a hardware event and a software event as below.
>>>>
>>>>  $ perf record -e cycles,dummy --per-thread ls
>>>>  failed to mmap with 22 (Invalid argument)
>>>>
>>>> The same task is sampled with the two events. The IOC_OUTPUT is invoked
>>>> to share the mmap memory of the task between the events. In the
>>>> perf_event_set_output(), the event->ctx is used to check whether the
>>>> two events are attached to the same task. However, a hardware event and
>>>> a software event are from different task context. The check always
>>>> fails.
>>>>
>>>> The task struct is stored in the event->hw.target for each per-thread
>>>> event. It can be used to determine whether two events are attached to
>>>> the same task.
>>>>
>>>> The patch can also fix another issue reported months ago.
>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/92645262-D319-4068-9C44-2409EF44888E@gmail.com/
>>>> The event->ctx is not ready when the perf_event_set_output() is invoked
>>>> in the perf_event_open(), while the event->hw.target has been assigned
>>>> at the moment.
>>>>
>>>> The problem should be a long time issue since commit c3f00c70276d
>>>> ("perf: Separate find_get_context() from event initialization"). The
>>>> event->hw.target doesn't exist at that time. Here, the patch which
>>>> introduces the event->hw.target is used by the Fixes tag.
>>>>
>>>> The problem should still exists between the broken patch and the
>>>> event->hw.target patch. This patch does not intend to fix that case.
>>>>
>>>> Fixes: 50f16a8bf9d7 ("perf: Remove type specific target pointers")
>>>> Reviewed-by: Zhengjun Xing <zhengjun.xing@...ux.intel.com>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
>>>
>>> Did this slip through the cracks, or is there more complexity
>>> to this case than just sharing the rb?
>>
>> Both; I very much missed it, but looking at it now, I'm not at all sure
>> it is correct prior to the whole context rewrite we did recently.
>>
>> So after the rewrite every cpu/task only has a single
>> perf_event_context, and your change below is actually an equivalence.
>>

Right, they are equivalent after the rewrite. I cannot reproduce the
"failed to mmap with 22 (Invalid argument)" issue with 6.2 and later
anymore.

But the issue reported by Nadav* can still be reproduced with the latest
6.3-rc.*
https://lore.kernel.org/all/92645262-D319-4068-9C44-2409EF44888E@gmail.com/
Because the event->ctx is still not set when the perf_event_set_output()
is invoked
in the perf_event_open(). The rewrite doesn't change with it.


>> But prior to that a task could have multiple contexts. Now they got
>> co-scheduled most of the times and it will probably work, but I'm not
>> entirely sure.
>>
>> So how about we change the Fixes tag to something like:
>>
>> Fixes: c3f00c70276d ("perf: Separate find_get_context() from event initialization") # >= v6.2
>>

Not sure if we want the # >= v6.2.

For v6.2 and later, the patch can fixes Nadav's issue.

For v6.1 and earlier, the patch fixes both Nadav's issue and the issue
described in the description.

I think I can send a V2 patch to make the history clear in the description.

Thanks,
Kan

>> And anybody that wants to back-port this further gets to either do the
>> full audit and/or keep the pieces.
>>
>> Hmm?
> 
> Seems reasonable to me.  Kan?
> 
>>
>>>> ---
>>>>  kernel/events/core.c | 2 +-
>>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
>>>> index b4d62210c3e5..22df79d3f19d 100644
>>>> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
>>>> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
>>>> @@ -12080,7 +12080,7 @@ perf_event_set_output(struct perf_event *event, struct perf_event *output_event)
>>>>  	/*
>>>>  	 * If its not a per-cpu rb, it must be the same task.
>>>>  	 */
>>>> -	if (output_event->cpu == -1 && output_event->ctx != event->ctx)
>>>> +	if (output_event->cpu == -1 && output_event->hw.target != event->hw.target)
>>>>  		goto out;
>>>>  
>>>>  	/*
>>>
>