[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2a3b08ce-5ab1-41b6-ad58-edbeff7b1acb@spud>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 19:44:13 +0000
From: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
To: Andrew Jones <ajones@...tanamicro.com>
Cc: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@...c4.com>,
Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
Anup Patel <anup@...infault.org>,
Atish Patra <atishp@...shpatra.org>,
Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, kvm-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
regressions@...mhuis.info, regressions@...ts.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: require alternatives framework when selecting FPU
support
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 08:26:10PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 03:17:13PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 01:46:31PM +0100, Andrew Jones wrote:
> > > (It's tempting to just select RISCV_ALTERNATIVE from RISCV, but maybe we
> > > can defer that wedding a bit longer.)
> >
> > At that point, the config option should just go away entirely, no?
>
> Ah, yes, and that makes the idea even more attractive, as we could remove
> several ifdefs.
I went and did the cursory check, it's not compatible with XIP_KERNEL so
dropping the option entirely probably isn't a possibility :/
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (229 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists