linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/2] net: phy: at803x: fix the wol setting functions

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <AM0PR04MB6289A4E1DA8BEAA065714B328F869@AM0PR04MB6289.eurprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Mar 2023 19:55:56 +0000
From:   Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>
To:     Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
CC:     Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        David Bauer <mail@...id-bauer.net>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Viorel Suman <viorel.suman@....com>,
        Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/2] net: phy: at803x: fix the wol setting
 functions



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
> Sent: Friday, March 3, 2023 7:29 PM
> To: Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>
> Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>; Heiner Kallweit
> <hkallweit1@...il.com>; Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>; David S .
> Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; David Bauer <mail@...id-bauer.net>;
> netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Viorel Suman
> <viorel.suman@....com>; Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v2 1/2] net: phy: at803x: fix the wol setting
> functions
> 
> On Tue, 28 Feb 2023 21:01:25 -0600 Li Yang wrote:
> > In 7beecaf7d507 ("net: phy: at803x: improve the WOL feature"), it
> > seems not correct to use a wol_en bit in a 1588 Control Register which
> > is only available on AR8031/AR8033(share the same phy_id) to determine
> > if WoL is enabled.  Change it back to use AT803X_INTR_ENABLE_WOL for
> > determining the WoL status which is applicable on all chips supporting
> > wol. Also update the at803x_set_wol() function to only update the 1588
> > register on chips having it.  After this change, disabling wol at
> > probe from d7cd5e06c9dd ("net: phy: at803x: disable WOL at probe") is
> > no longer needed.  So that part is removed.
> >
> > Fixes: 7beecaf7d507b ("net: phy: at803x: improve the WOL feature")
> 
> Given the fixes tag Luo Jie <luoj@...eaurora.org> should be CCed.

Sorry for the late response, I missed this email.  I tried to cc him, but the email bounced.

> 
> > Signed-off-by: Li Yang <leoyang.li@....com>
> > Reviewed-by: Viorel Suman <viorel.suman@....com>
> > Reviewed-by: Wei Fang <wei.fang@....com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/net/phy/at803x.c | 40
> > ++++++++++++++++------------------------
> >  1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/phy/at803x.c b/drivers/net/phy/at803x.c index
> > 22f4458274aa..2102279b3964 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/phy/at803x.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/phy/at803x.c
> > @@ -461,21 +461,25 @@ static int at803x_set_wol(struct phy_device
> *phydev,
> >  			phy_write_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_PCS,
> offsets[i],
> >  				      mac[(i * 2) + 1] | (mac[(i * 2)] << 8));
> >
> > -		/* Enable WOL function */
> > -		ret = phy_modify_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_PCS,
> AT803X_PHY_MMD3_WOL_CTRL,
> > -				0, AT803X_WOL_EN);
> > -		if (ret)
> > -			return ret;
> > +		/* Enable WOL function for 1588 */
> > +		if (phydev->drv->phy_id == ATH8031_PHY_ID) {
> > +			ret = phy_modify_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_PCS,
> > +AT803X_PHY_MMD3_WOL_CTRL,
> 
> This line is now too long, unless there is a good reason please stick to the 80
> char maximum.
> 
> > +					0, AT803X_WOL_EN);
> 
> while at it please fix the alignment, the continuation line should start under
> phydev (checkpatch will tell you)
> 
> > +			if (ret)
> > +				return ret;
> > +		}
> >  		/* Enable WOL interrupt */
> >  		ret = phy_modify(phydev, AT803X_INTR_ENABLE, 0,
> AT803X_INTR_ENABLE_WOL);
> >  		if (ret)
> >  			return ret;
> >  	} else {
> > -		/* Disable WoL function */
> > -		ret = phy_modify_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_PCS,
> AT803X_PHY_MMD3_WOL_CTRL,
> > -				AT803X_WOL_EN, 0);
> > -		if (ret)
> > -			return ret;
> > +		/* Disable WoL function for 1588 */
> > +		if (phydev->drv->phy_id == ATH8031_PHY_ID) {
> > +			ret = phy_modify_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_PCS,
> AT803X_PHY_MMD3_WOL_CTRL,
> > +					AT803X_WOL_EN, 0);
> 
> same comments as above
> 
> > +			if (ret)
> > +				return ret;
> > +		}
> >  		/* Disable WOL interrupt */
> >  		ret = phy_modify(phydev, AT803X_INTR_ENABLE,
> AT803X_INTR_ENABLE_WOL, 0);
> >  		if (ret)
> > @@ -510,11 +514,8 @@ static void at803x_get_wol(struct phy_device
> *phydev,
> >  	wol->supported = WAKE_MAGIC;
> >  	wol->wolopts = 0;
> >
> > -	value = phy_read_mmd(phydev, MDIO_MMD_PCS,
> AT803X_PHY_MMD3_WOL_CTRL);
> > -	if (value < 0)
> > -		return;
> > -
> > -	if (value & AT803X_WOL_EN)
> > +	value = phy_read(phydev, AT803X_INTR_ENABLE);
> 
> Does phy_read() never fail? Why remove the error checking?
> 
> > +	if (value & AT803X_INTR_ENABLE_WOL)
> >  		wol->wolopts |= WAKE_MAGIC;
> >  }
> >