[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230322195639.1995821-38-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 15:56:32 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Adham Faris <afaris@...dia.com>, Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>,
Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, davem@...emloft.net,
edumazet@...gle.com, kuba@...nel.org, pabeni@...hat.com,
ast@...nel.org, daniel@...earbox.net, hawk@...nel.org,
john.fastabend@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.2 38/45] net/mlx5e: Lower maximum allowed MTU in XSK to match XDP prerequisites
From: Adham Faris <afaris@...dia.com>
[ Upstream commit 78dee7befd56987283c13877b834c0aa97ad51b9 ]
XSK redirecting XDP programs require linearity, hence applies
restrictions on the MTU. For PAGE_SIZE=4K, MTU shouldn't exceed 3498.
Features that contradict with XDP such HW-LRO and HW-GRO are enforced
by the driver in advance, during XSK params validation, except for MTU,
which was not enforced before this patch.
This has been spotted during test scenario described below:
Attaching xdpsock program (PAGE_SIZE=4K), with MTU < 3498, detaching
XDP program, changing the MTU to arbitrary value in the range
[3499, 3754], attaching XDP program again, which ended up with failure
since MTU is > 3498.
This commit lowers the XSK MTU limitation to be aligned with XDP MTU
limitation, since XSK socket is meaningless without XDP program.
Signed-off-by: Adham Faris <afaris@...dia.com>
Reviewed-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c | 10 +++++++---
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
index 6c24f33a5ea5c..a859c8ce1d664 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c
@@ -4113,13 +4113,17 @@ static bool mlx5e_xsk_validate_mtu(struct net_device *netdev,
struct xsk_buff_pool *xsk_pool =
mlx5e_xsk_get_pool(&chs->params, chs->params.xsk, ix);
struct mlx5e_xsk_param xsk;
+ int max_xdp_mtu;
if (!xsk_pool)
continue;
mlx5e_build_xsk_param(xsk_pool, &xsk);
+ max_xdp_mtu = mlx5e_xdp_max_mtu(new_params, &xsk);
- if (!mlx5e_validate_xsk_param(new_params, &xsk, mdev)) {
+ /* Validate XSK params and XDP MTU in advance */
+ if (!mlx5e_validate_xsk_param(new_params, &xsk, mdev) ||
+ new_params->sw_mtu > max_xdp_mtu) {
u32 hr = mlx5e_get_linear_rq_headroom(new_params, &xsk);
int max_mtu_frame, max_mtu_page, max_mtu;
@@ -4129,9 +4133,9 @@ static bool mlx5e_xsk_validate_mtu(struct net_device *netdev,
*/
max_mtu_frame = MLX5E_HW2SW_MTU(new_params, xsk.chunk_size - hr);
max_mtu_page = MLX5E_HW2SW_MTU(new_params, SKB_MAX_HEAD(0));
- max_mtu = min(max_mtu_frame, max_mtu_page);
+ max_mtu = min3(max_mtu_frame, max_mtu_page, max_xdp_mtu);
- netdev_err(netdev, "MTU %d is too big for an XSK running on channel %u. Try MTU <= %d\n",
+ netdev_err(netdev, "MTU %d is too big for an XSK running on channel %u or its redirection XDP program. Try MTU <= %d\n",
new_params->sw_mtu, ix, max_mtu);
return false;
}
--
2.39.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists