[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <167952396475.5837.11598351113694705444.tip-bot2@tip-bot2>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 22:26:04 -0000
From: "tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <tip-bot2@...utronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: locking/core] locking/rwbase: Mitigate indefinite writer starvation.
The following commit has been merged into the locking/core branch of tip:
Commit-ID: 9d29d8e36cd6448966d83ab1acf946a2df3c2833
Gitweb: https://git.kernel.org/tip/9d29d8e36cd6448966d83ab1acf946a2df3c2833
Author: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
AuthorDate: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 17:11:40 +01:00
Committer: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CommitterDate: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 23:17:38 +01:00
locking/rwbase: Mitigate indefinite writer starvation.
On PREEMPT_RT rw_semaphore and rwlock_t locks are unfair to writers.
Readers can indefinitely acquire the lock unless the writer fully acquired
the lock, which might never happen if there is always a reader in the
critical section owning the lock.
Mel Gorman reported that since LTP-20220121 the dio_truncate test case
went from having 1 reader to having 16 readers and that number of readers
is sufficient to prevent the down_write ever succeeding while readers
exist. Eventually the test is killed after 30 minutes as a failure.
Mel proposed a timeout to limit how long a writer can be blocked until
the reader is forced into the slowpath.
Thomas argued that there is no added value by providing this timeout. From
a PREEMPT_RT point of view, there are no critical rw_semaphore or rwlock_t
locks left where the reader must be preferred.
Mitigate indefinite writer starvation by forcing the READER into the
slowpath once the WRITER attempts to acquire the lock.
Reported-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/877cwbq4cq.ffs@tglx
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230321161140.HMcQEhHb@linutronix.de
---
kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c | 9 ---------
1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c b/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c
index c201aad..25ec023 100644
--- a/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c
+++ b/kernel/locking/rwbase_rt.c
@@ -72,15 +72,6 @@ static int __sched __rwbase_read_lock(struct rwbase_rt *rwb,
int ret;
raw_spin_lock_irq(&rtm->wait_lock);
- /*
- * Allow readers, as long as the writer has not completely
- * acquired the semaphore for write.
- */
- if (atomic_read(&rwb->readers) != WRITER_BIAS) {
- atomic_inc(&rwb->readers);
- raw_spin_unlock_irq(&rtm->wait_lock);
- return 0;
- }
/*
* Call into the slow lock path with the rtmutex->wait_lock
Powered by blists - more mailing lists