[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230322045323.zxlf5wuhizabvvlc@treble>
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2023 21:53:23 -0700
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...nel.org>
To: x86@...nel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@...gle.com>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
Will McVicker <willmcvicker@...gle.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/11] static_call: Improve key type abstraction
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 09:00:07PM -0700, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/static_call_inline.c b/kernel/static_call_inline.c
> index 639397b5491c..41f6bda6773a 100644
> --- a/kernel/static_call_inline.c
> +++ b/kernel/static_call_inline.c
> @@ -112,15 +112,21 @@ static inline void static_call_sort_entries(struct static_call_site *start,
>
> static inline bool static_call_key_has_mods(struct static_call_key *key)
> {
> - return !(key->type & 1);
> + return !!(key->type & 1);
> }
>
> -static inline struct static_call_mod *static_call_key_next(struct static_call_key *key)
> +static inline struct static_call_mod *static_call_key_mods(struct static_call_key *key)
> {
> if (!static_call_key_has_mods(key))
> return NULL;
>
> - return key->mods;
> + return (struct static_call_mod *)(key->type & ~1);
> +}
> +
Oops, these parts belonged in the next patch.
--
Josh
Powered by blists - more mailing lists