lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230322064956.263419-4-baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Mar 2023 14:49:53 +0800
From:   Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
To:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc:     Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
        Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        Kevin Tian <kevin.tian@...el.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, iommu@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 3/6] iommu: Same critical region for device release and removal

In a non-driver context, it is crucial to ensure the consistency of a
device's iommu ops. Otherwise, it may result in a situation where a
device is released but it's iommu ops are still used.

Put the ops->release_device and __iommu_group_remove_device() in a same
group->mutext critical region, so that, as long as group->mutex is held
and the device is in its group's device list, its iommu ops are always
consistent. Add check of group ownership if the released device is the
last one.

Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
Signed-off-by: Lu Baolu <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>
---
 drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
index 43db48323370..6d27fd585e75 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
@@ -495,18 +495,44 @@ static void __iommu_group_release_device(struct iommu_group *group,
 
 void iommu_release_device(struct device *dev)
 {
+	struct iommu_group *group = dev->iommu_group;
+	struct group_device *device;
 	const struct iommu_ops *ops;
 
-	if (!dev->iommu)
+	if (!dev->iommu || !group)
 		return;
 
 	iommu_device_unlink(dev->iommu->iommu_dev, dev);
 
+	mutex_lock(&group->mutex);
+	device = __iommu_group_remove_device(group, dev);
+
+	/*
+	 * If the group has become empty then ownership must have been released,
+	 * and the current domain must be set back to NULL or the default
+	 * domain.
+	 */
+	if (list_empty(&group->devices))
+		WARN_ON(group->owner_cnt ||
+			group->domain != group->default_domain);
+
+	/*
+	 * release_device() must stop using any attached domain on the device.
+	 * If there are still other devices in the group they are not effected
+	 * by this callback.
+	 *
+	 * The IOMMU driver must set the device to either an identity or
+	 * blocking translation and stop using any domain pointer, as it is
+	 * going to be freed.
+	 */
 	ops = dev_iommu_ops(dev);
 	if (ops->release_device)
 		ops->release_device(dev);
+	mutex_unlock(&group->mutex);
+
+	if (device)
+		__iommu_group_release_device(group, device);
 
-	iommu_group_remove_device(dev);
 	module_put(ops->owner);
 	dev_iommu_free(dev);
 }
-- 
2.34.1

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ