linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH memory-model 5/8] tools/memory-model: Provide exact SRCU semantics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZBpU3BAqmTQHxEyN@andrea>
Date:   Wed, 22 Mar 2023 02:07:40 +0100
From:   Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
To:     "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-team@...a.com, mingo@...nel.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
        will@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, boqun.feng@...il.com,
        npiggin@...il.com, dhowells@...hat.com, j.alglave@....ac.uk,
        luc.maranget@...ia.fr, akiyks@...il.com,
        Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@...weicloud.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH memory-model 5/8] tools/memory-model: Provide exact SRCU
 semantics

> +let carry-srcu-data = (data ; [~ Srcu-unlock] ; rf)*

> +let carry-dep = (data ; [~ Srcu-unlock] ; rfi)*

Nit: we use "~M" (no space after the unary operator) in this file, is
there a reason for the different styles?

  Andrea