[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBpU3BAqmTQHxEyN@andrea>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 02:07:40 +0100
From: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-team@...a.com, mingo@...nel.org, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
will@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, boqun.feng@...il.com,
npiggin@...il.com, dhowells@...hat.com, j.alglave@....ac.uk,
luc.maranget@...ia.fr, akiyks@...il.com,
Jonas Oberhauser <jonas.oberhauser@...weicloud.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH memory-model 5/8] tools/memory-model: Provide exact SRCU
semantics
> +let carry-srcu-data = (data ; [~ Srcu-unlock] ; rf)*
> +let carry-dep = (data ; [~ Srcu-unlock] ; rfi)*
Nit: we use "~M" (no space after the unary operator) in this file, is
there a reason for the different styles?
Andrea
Powered by blists - more mailing lists