[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBqypsYBMSr8HPxP@hovoldconsulting.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 08:47:50 +0100
From: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@...il.com>,
Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@...cinc.com>,
Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/10] drm/msm: fix drm device leak on bind errors
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 04:54:51PM +0200, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> On 06/03/2023 12:07, Johan Hovold wrote:
> > Make sure to free the DRM device also in case of early errors during
> > bind().
> >
> > Fixes: 2027e5b3413d ("drm/msm: Initialize MDSS irq domain at probe time")
> > Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org # 5.17
> > Cc: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@...aro.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Johan Hovold <johan+linaro@...nel.org>
>
> Can we migrate to devm_drm_dev_alloc instead() ? Will it make code
> simpler and/or easier to handle?
I'm just fixing the bugs here. Cleanups/rework like that can be done on
top but should not be backported as it risks introducing new issues.
Johan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists