linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv16 00/17] Linear Address Masking enabling

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAG_fn=XBibcjsGZX=+m7pQTduNiaBZLTGEM4m99hwyiT0Q3-mA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 22 Mar 2023 13:48:59 +0100
From:   Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>
To:     Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
Cc:     "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
        Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Kostya Serebryany <kcc@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...il.com>,
        Taras Madan <tarasmadan@...gle.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        "H . J . Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>,
        Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        Rick Edgecombe <rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com>,
        Bharata B Rao <bharata@....com>,
        Jacob Pan <jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com>,
        Ashok Raj <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv16 00/17] Linear Address Masking enabling

On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 6:28 PM Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com> wrote:
>
> On 3/17/23 10:21, Alexander Potapenko wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 17, 2023 at 6:18 PM Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com> wrote:
> >> Dear x86 maintainers,
> >>
> >> the series looks pretty mature now, any chance it can be considered
> >> for upstream?
> >>
> > (Adding the maintainers just to be sure)
>
> Yes, I'm running it through a few tests right now actually.  If
> everything looks good, I'm planning on queueing it.

Hi Dave,

Did this work out?

Thanks!