| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20230322140434.GC2357380@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 15:04:34 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-csky@...r.kernel.org,
linux-hexagon@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
openrisc@...ts.librecores.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-sh@...r.kernel.org,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
x86@...nel.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] sched, smp: Trace smp callback causing an IPI
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 12:20:28PM +0000, Valentin Schneider wrote:
> On 22/03/23 10:53, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Hurmph... so we only really consume @func when we IPI. Would it not be
> > more useful to trace this thing for *every* csd enqeued?
>
> It's true that any CSD enqueued on that CPU's call_single_queue in the
> [first CSD llist_add()'ed, IPI IRQ hits] timeframe is a potential source of
> interference.
>
> However, can we be sure that first CSD isn't an indirect cause for the
> following ones? say the target CPU exits RCU EQS due to the IPI, there's a
> bit of time before it gets to flush_smp_call_function_queue() where some other CSD
> could be enqueued *because* of that change in state.
>
> I couldn't find a easy example of that, I might be biased as this is where
> I'd like to go wrt IPI'ing isolated CPUs in usermode. But regardless, when
> correlating an IPI IRQ with its source, we'd always have to look at the
> first CSD in that CSD stack.
So I was thinking something like this:
---
Subject: trace,smp: Trace all smp_function_call*() invocations
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Date: Wed Mar 22 14:58:36 CET 2023
(Ab)use the trace_ipi_send_cpu*() family to trace all
smp_function_call*() invocations, not only those that result in an
actual IPI.
The queued entries log their callback function while the actual IPIs
are traced on generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt().
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
kernel/smp.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/smp.c
+++ b/kernel/smp.c
@@ -106,18 +106,20 @@ void __init call_function_init(void)
}
static __always_inline void
-send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu, smp_call_func_t func)
+send_call_function_single_ipi(int cpu)
{
if (call_function_single_prep_ipi(cpu)) {
- trace_ipi_send_cpu(cpu, _RET_IP_, func);
+ trace_ipi_send_cpu(cpu, _RET_IP_,
+ generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt);
arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu);
}
}
static __always_inline void
-send_call_function_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask, smp_call_func_t func)
+send_call_function_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask)
{
- trace_ipi_send_cpumask(mask, _RET_IP_, func);
+ trace_ipi_send_cpumask(mask, _RET_IP_,
+ generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt);
arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(mask);
}
@@ -318,25 +320,6 @@ static __always_inline void csd_unlock(s
smp_store_release(&csd->node.u_flags, 0);
}
-static __always_inline void
-raw_smp_call_single_queue(int cpu, struct llist_node *node, smp_call_func_t func)
-{
- /*
- * The list addition should be visible to the target CPU when it pops
- * the head of the list to pull the entry off it in the IPI handler
- * because of normal cache coherency rules implied by the underlying
- * llist ops.
- *
- * If IPIs can go out of order to the cache coherency protocol
- * in an architecture, sufficient synchronisation should be added
- * to arch code to make it appear to obey cache coherency WRT
- * locking and barrier primitives. Generic code isn't really
- * equipped to do the right thing...
- */
- if (llist_add(node, &per_cpu(call_single_queue, cpu)))
- send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu, func);
-}
-
static DEFINE_PER_CPU_SHARED_ALIGNED(call_single_data_t, csd_data);
void __smp_call_single_queue(int cpu, struct llist_node *node)
@@ -356,10 +339,23 @@ void __smp_call_single_queue(int cpu, st
func = CSD_TYPE(csd) == CSD_TYPE_TTWU ?
sched_ttwu_pending : csd->func;
- raw_smp_call_single_queue(cpu, node, func);
- } else {
- raw_smp_call_single_queue(cpu, node, NULL);
+ trace_ipi_send_cpu(cpu, _RET_IP_, func);
}
+
+ /*
+ * The list addition should be visible to the target CPU when it pops
+ * the head of the list to pull the entry off it in the IPI handler
+ * because of normal cache coherency rules implied by the underlying
+ * llist ops.
+ *
+ * If IPIs can go out of order to the cache coherency protocol
+ * in an architecture, sufficient synchronisation should be added
+ * to arch code to make it appear to obey cache coherency WRT
+ * locking and barrier primitives. Generic code isn't really
+ * equipped to do the right thing...
+ */
+ if (llist_add(node, &per_cpu(call_single_queue, cpu)))
+ send_call_function_single_ipi(cpu);
}
/*
@@ -798,14 +794,20 @@ static void smp_call_function_many_cond(
}
/*
+ * Trace each smp_function_call_*() as an IPI, actual IPIs
+ * will be traced with func==generic_smp_call_function_single_ipi().
+ */
+ trace_ipi_send_cpumask(cfd->cpumask_ipi, _RET_IP_, func);
+
+ /*
* Choose the most efficient way to send an IPI. Note that the
* number of CPUs might be zero due to concurrent changes to the
* provided mask.
*/
if (nr_cpus == 1)
- send_call_function_single_ipi(last_cpu, func);
+ send_call_function_single_ipi(last_cpu);
else if (likely(nr_cpus > 1))
- send_call_function_ipi_mask(cfd->cpumask_ipi, func);
+ send_call_function_ipi_mask(cfd->cpumask_ipi);
}
if (run_local && (!cond_func || cond_func(this_cpu, info))) {
Powered by blists - more mailing lists