[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230322144005.40368-11-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 16:40:01 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Bumwoo Lee <bw365.lee@...sung.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 10/14] extcon: use dev_of_node(dev) instead of dev->of_node
The dev_of_node function should be preferred.
In the result we may drop unneeded NULL check
of the pointer to the device object.
Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
---
drivers/extcon/extcon.c | 12 ++++--------
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
index 5cadbfc151e6..32e96cb49067 100644
--- a/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
+++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon.c
@@ -1429,21 +1429,17 @@ struct extcon_dev *extcon_find_edev_by_node(struct device_node *node)
*/
struct extcon_dev *extcon_get_edev_by_phandle(struct device *dev, int index)
{
- struct device_node *node;
+ struct device_node *node, *np = dev_of_node(dev);
struct extcon_dev *edev;
- if (!dev)
- return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
-
- if (!dev->of_node) {
+ if (!np) {
dev_dbg(dev, "device does not have a device node entry\n");
return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
}
- node = of_parse_phandle(dev->of_node, "extcon", index);
+ node = of_parse_phandle(np, "extcon", index);
if (!node) {
- dev_dbg(dev, "failed to get phandle in %pOF node\n",
- dev->of_node);
+ dev_dbg(dev, "failed to get phandle in %pOF node\n", np);
return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
}
--
2.40.0.1.gaa8946217a0b
Powered by blists - more mailing lists