[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f085aa9225c573df906bdc7ff032a8fd591b18b3.camel@ndufresne.ca>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 10:50:52 -0400
From: Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>
Cc: David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>,
Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@...labora.com>,
"tfiga@...omium.org" <tfiga@...omium.org>,
"m.szyprowski@...sung.com" <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
"mchehab@...nel.org" <mchehab@...nel.org>,
"ming.qian@....com" <ming.qian@....com>,
"shijie.qin@....com" <shijie.qin@....com>,
"eagle.zhou@....com" <eagle.zhou@....com>,
"bin.liu@...iatek.com" <bin.liu@...iatek.com>,
"matthias.bgg@...il.com" <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
"angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com"
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>,
"tiffany.lin@...iatek.com" <tiffany.lin@...iatek.com>,
"andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com" <andrew-ct.chen@...iatek.com>,
"yunfei.dong@...iatek.com" <yunfei.dong@...iatek.com>,
"stanimir.k.varbanov@...il.com" <stanimir.k.varbanov@...il.com>,
"quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com" <quic_vgarodia@...cinc.com>,
"agross@...nel.org" <agross@...nel.org>,
"andersson@...nel.org" <andersson@...nel.org>,
"konrad.dybcio@...aro.org" <konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>,
"ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar" <ezequiel@...guardiasur.com.ar>,
"p.zabel@...gutronix.de" <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"daniel.almeida@...labora.com" <daniel.almeida@...labora.com>,
"linux-media@...r.kernel.org" <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
"kernel@...labora.com" <kernel@...labora.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/4] media: videobuf2: Replace bufs array by a list
Hi Laurent,
Le lundi 20 mars 2023 à 01:33 +0200, Laurent Pinchart a écrit :
> > The typical usage is that applications allocate N buffers with the
> > VIDIOC_REQBUFS ioctl, and in most cases that's all they use.
>
> Note that once we get DELETE_BUF (or DELETE_BUFS) support I'd like to
> encourage applications to use the new API, and deprecate REQBUFS
> (dropping it isn't on my radar, as it would take forever before no
> userspace uses it anymore).
I was wondering if you can extend on this. I'm worried the count semantic might
prevent emulating it over create_bufs() ops, but if that works, did you meant to
emulate it so driver no longer have to implement reqbufs() if they have
create_bufs() ?
Nicolas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists