[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ea7d76f4-806d-4643-8339-aced5bf4b858@roeck-us.net>
Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2023 08:02:10 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, patches@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org, pavel@...x.de, jonathanh@...dia.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com,
srw@...dewatkins.net, rwarsow@....de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.1 000/199] 6.1.21-rc3 review
On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 07:08:16PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 6.1.21 release.
> There are 199 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> let me know.
>
> Responses should be made by Thu, 23 Mar 2023 18:07:05 +0000.
> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>
It is still Wednesday here, but v6.1.21 has already been released.
Sorry, my test bed isn't that fast. No issues reported yet, but
it seems pointless to send final results at this point. I'll only
report if there is a problem. Same for v6.2.8.
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists