[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1429678a9994885a93fad0b1294fde6d71e692b1.camel@linux.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 16:05:51 +0100
From: Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...hat.com>,
Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@...hat.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>
Cc: linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
spice-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/38] drm: handle HAS_IOPORT dependencies
On Wed, 2023-03-15 at 13:54 +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Mar 2023, Niklas Schnelle <schnelle@...ux.ibm.com> wrote:
> > In a future patch HAS_IOPORT=n will result in inb()/outb() and friends
> > not being declared. We thus need to add HAS_IOPORT as dependency for
> > those drivers using them. In the bochs driver there is optional MMIO
> > support detected at runtime, warn if this isn't taken when
> > HAS_IOPORT is not defined.
>
> Not that I care a whole lot, but there should really only be one warning
> or even failure to probe at bochs_hw_init() for !bochs->mmio &&
> !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT), not warnings all over the place.
>
> Moreover, the config macro is CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT instead of HAS_IOPORT
> that you check for below.
>
> BR,
> Jani.
>
Good Find! Yes the #ifdefs need CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT I even had it
correctly for cirrus in the same patch. For v4 I remove the separate
warnings and instead went with the below:
@@ -229,6 +242,10 @@ static int bochs_hw_init(struct drm_device *dev)
return -ENOMEM;
}
} else {
+ if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_HAS_IOPORT)) {
+ DRM_ERROR("I/O ports are not supported\n");
+ return -EIO;
+ }
ioaddr = VBE_DISPI_IOPORT_INDEX;
iosize = 2;
if (!request_region(ioaddr, iosize, "bochs-drm")) {
Thanks,
Niklas
Powered by blists - more mailing lists