[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230323150939.GA737760@cmpxchg.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 11:09:39 -0400
From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
To: Domenico Cerasuolo <cerasuolodomenico@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, peterz@...radead.org,
surenb@...gle.com, brauner@...nel.org, chris@...isdown.name
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] sched/psi: allow unprivileged polling of N*2s
period
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 11:33:50AM +0100, Domenico Cerasuolo wrote:
> @@ -151,6 +151,14 @@ struct psi_trigger {
>
> /* Deferred event(s) from previous ratelimit window */
> bool pending_event;
> +
> + /* Used to differentiate destruction action*/
> + enum psi_aggregators aggregator;
> +};
> +
> +struct trigger_info {
> + struct list_head triggers;
> + u32 nr_triggers[NR_PSI_STATES - 1];
> };
>
> struct psi_group {
> @@ -186,8 +194,7 @@ struct psi_group {
> struct mutex trigger_lock;
>
> /* Configured polling triggers */
> - struct list_head triggers;
> - u32 nr_triggers[NR_PSI_STATES - 1];
> + struct trigger_info trig_info[NR_PSI_AGGREGATORS];
> u32 poll_states;
> u64 poll_min_period;
Thanks for trying out this variant, but I think this is grouping up
unrelated things, and that makes the code more difficult to understand
and maintan.
The *only* thing that's shared between those two is the
update_triggers() part. trig_info[PSI_AVGS] doesn't use trigger_lock.
It also doesn't use poll_task, poll_wait, poll_wakeup, poll_scheduled,
poll_min_period, polling_next_update and polling_until. All these
things are specific to the rt polling thread.
The rename in the previous version is a bit churny, but it's justified
in order to keep unrelated things separate / make it obvious which
parts belong together, and who is reading and writing which fields.
So my vote would be on the previous version.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists