[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230323151438.GO2673958@google.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 15:14:38 +0000
From: Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc: ChiYuan Huang <cy_huang@...htek.com>,
ChiaEn Wu <chiaen_wu@...htek.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the leds-lj tree
On Thu, 23 Mar 2023, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After merging the leds-lj tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs)
> produced these warnings:
>
> Documentation/leds/leds-mt6370-rgb.rst: WARNING: document isn't included in any toctree
> Documentation/leds/leds-mt6370-rgb.rst:39: WARNING: Literal block ends without a blank line; unexpected unindent.
> Documentation/leds/leds-mt6370-rgb.rst:41: WARNING: Line block ends without a blank line.
> Documentation/leds/leds-mt6370-rgb.rst:46: ERROR: Unexpected indentation.
> Documentation/leds/leds-mt6370-rgb.rst:44: WARNING: Inline substitution_reference start-string without end-string.
> Documentation/leds/leds-mt6370-rgb.rst:50: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found.
What wizardry is this?
> Introduced by commit
>
> 4ba9df04b7ac ("docs: leds: Add MT6370 RGB LED pattern document")
There is a fixing set on the list that I need to review.
Please bear with me.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
Powered by blists - more mailing lists