linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/4] staging: rtl8192e: code cleanup patches

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <ZBxv2e1mkUJ5YRfG@kroah.com>
Date:   Thu, 23 Mar 2023 16:27:21 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Khadija Kamran <kamrankhadijadj@...il.com>
Cc:     Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>,
        Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>,
        outreachy@...ts.linux.dev, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH 0/4] staging: rtl8192e: code cleanup patches

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 08:23:17PM +0500, Khadija Kamran wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 04:34:43PM +0300, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 02:08:58PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > 
> > > 
> > > On Thu, 23 Mar 2023, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > 
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Thu, 23 Mar 2023, Khadija Kamran wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Fix several cleanup issues reported by checkpatch.pl in module
> > > > > staging/rtl8192e in file rtllib_rx.c
> > > >
> > > > Why is it resent?
> > > 
> > > OK, I see, sorry for the noise.
> > 
> > I'm still confused...  :P
> >
> 
> Hey Dan!
> 
> Sorry about the confusion. I sent the last patch with the wrong email
> mistakenly. It was causing following warning as reported by Philipp,
> Checkpatch:
> 
> WARNING: From:/Signed-off-by: email address mismatch: 'From: Khadija
> Kamran <kkamran.bese16seecs@...cs.edu.pk>' != 'Signed-off-by: Khadija
> Kamran <kamrankhadijadj@...il.com>
> 
> I resent this patch with the correct email address. I hope I did not do
> this wrong.

That would be a totally new version, as something changed, so document
it, otherwise we are confused.

thanks,

greg k-h