linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: add bound tracking for BPF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 23 Mar 2023 10:16:17 -0700
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
To:     Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...weicloud.com>
Cc:     bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>,
        "open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" 
        <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>,
        Song Liu <song@...nel.org>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
        Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...gle.com>,
        Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>,
        Mykola Lysenko <mykolal@...com>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 1/2] bpf: add bound tracking for BPF_MOD

On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 8:59 AM Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...weicloud.com> wrote:
>
> From: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...wei.com>
>
> dst_reg is marked as unknown when BPF_MOD instruction is verified, causing
> the following bpf prog to be incorrectly rejected.
>
> 0: r0 = 0
> 1: r0 %= 1   // r0 is marked as unknown
> 2: r1 = 0
> 3: r1 += 1
> 4: if r1 < r0 goto pc-2 // verifier treats the loop as unbounded
> 5: exit
>
> To teach verifier to accept the above prog, this patch adds bound tracking
> for BPF_MOD.
>
> The approach is based on the following rules:
>
> 1. BPF_MOD is unsigned;
>
> 2. For an unsigned constant divisor x:
>
>  a. when x != 0, the resulted dst_reg bits are in the range [0, x - 1],
>     and if no wrapping occurs, the result can be further narrowed down
>     to [umin mod x, umax mod x];
>
>  b. when x == 0, dst_reg is truncated to 32 bits by mod32 or remains
>     unchanged by mod64.
>
> Signed-off-by: Xu Kuohai <xukuohai@...wei.com>

Same Nack as before.
You haven't answered _why_ anyone needs it.