[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZByU4tbhkhnF4kMw@kroah.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 19:05:22 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Ye Xiang <xiang.ye@...el.com>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
Lee Jones <lee@...nel.org>, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...nel.org>,
Tyrone Ting <kfting@...oton.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
srinivas.pandruvada@...el.com, heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com,
andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com, sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
zhifeng.wang@...el.com, wentong.wu@...el.com, lixu.zhang@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] usb: Add support for Intel LJCA device
On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 01:21:08AM +0800, Ye Xiang wrote:
> +config USB_LJCA
> + tristate "Intel La Jolla Cove Adapter support"
> + select AUXILIARY_BUS
> + depends on USB
> + help
> + This adds support for Intel La Jolla Cove USB-I2C/SPI/GPIO
> + Master Adapter (LJCA). Additional drivers such as I2C_LJCA,
> + GPIO_LJCA and SPI_LJCA must be enabled in order to use the
> + functionality of the device.
> +
> + This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
> + will be called ljca.
That's a very generic name for a USB driver, why not "usb_ljca"?
> +struct ljca_dev {
> + struct usb_device *udev;
You didn't remove this like you said you would :(
Powered by blists - more mailing lists