[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <84b81ceb-1c7f-0dac-1988-0a9c0af2757c@wanadoo.fr>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 20:17:01 +0100
From: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Mathias Nyman <mathias.nyman@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] usb: pci-quirks: Remove a useless initialization
Le 23/03/2023 à 17:32, Greg Kroah-Hartman a écrit :
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 10:43:10PM +0100, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
>> 'info' is memset()'ed a few lines below and is not use in the between.
>>
>> There is no need to initialize one of its field to false here.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jaillet@...adoo.fr>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c | 1 -
>> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c b/drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c
>> index 6b741327d2c4..46f2412dcb40 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/pci-quirks.c
>> @@ -208,7 +208,6 @@ static void usb_amd_find_chipset_info(void)
>> {
>> unsigned long flags;
>> struct amd_chipset_info info;
>> - info.need_pll_quirk = false;
> Why not just change the line above it to:
> struct amd_chipset_info info = { };
> and drop the call to memset entirely?
I find an explicit memset() more readable, but it's mostly a matter of
taste.
I'll send a v2.
CJ
> thanks,
>
> greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists