[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBy0ZNYcHFlZWN32@1wt.eu>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 21:19:48 +0100
From: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@...ssschuh.net>
Cc: Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/8] tools/nolibc: x86_64: add stackprotector support
Hi Thomas,
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 03:41:08PM +0000, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> Enable the new stackprotector support for x86_64.
(...)
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
> index 8f069ebdd124..543555f4cbdc 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
> @@ -80,6 +80,8 @@ CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR = -DNOLIBC_STACKPROTECTOR \
> $(call cc-option,-mstack-protector-guard=global) \
> $(call cc-option,-fstack-protector-all)
> CFLAGS_i386 = $(CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR)
> +CFLAGS_x86_64 = $(CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR)
> +CFLAGS_x86 = $(CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR)
> CFLAGS_s390 = -m64
> CFLAGS ?= -Os -fno-ident -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables \
> $(call cc-option,-fno-stack-protector) \
This change is making it almost impossible for me to pass external CFLAGS
without forcefully disabling the automatic detection of stackprot. I need
to do it for some archs (e.g. "-march=armv5t -mthumb") or even to change
optimization levels.
I figured that the simplest way to recover that functionality for me
consists in using a dedicated variable to assign stack protector per
supported architecure and concatenating it to the per-arch CFLAGS like
this:
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
index 543555f4cbdc..bbce57420465 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/Makefile
@@ -79,13 +79,13 @@ endif
CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR = -DNOLIBC_STACKPROTECTOR \
$(call cc-option,-mstack-protector-guard=global) \
$(call cc-option,-fstack-protector-all)
-CFLAGS_i386 = $(CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR)
-CFLAGS_x86_64 = $(CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR)
-CFLAGS_x86 = $(CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR)
+CFLAGS_STKP_i386 = $(CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR)
+CFLAGS_STKP_x86_64 = $(CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR)
+CFLAGS_STKP_x86 = $(CFLAGS_STACKPROTECTOR)
CFLAGS_s390 = -m64
CFLAGS ?= -Os -fno-ident -fno-asynchronous-unwind-tables \
$(call cc-option,-fno-stack-protector) \
- $(CFLAGS_$(ARCH))
+ $(CFLAGS_STKP_$(ARCH)) $(CFLAGS_$(ARCH))
LDFLAGS := -s
help:
And now with this it works again for me on all archs, with all of them
showing "SKIPPED" for the -fstackprotector line except i386/x86_64 which
show "OK".
Are you OK with this approach ? And if so, do you want to respin it or
do you want me to retrofit it into your 3 patches that introduce this
change (it's easy enough so I really don't care) ?
Thanks!
Willy
Powered by blists - more mailing lists