[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20230323150755.06f8977fa2b860b8e02c37c3@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 15:07:55 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>
Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>, x86@...nel.org,
Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/2] kexec: Remove unnecessary arch hook
On Thu, 23 Mar 2023 15:49:20 +0800 Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/07/23 at 04:44pm, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
> >
> > There are no arch-specific things in arch_kexec_kernel_image_load(), so
> > remove it and just use the generic version.
> >
> > v1 is at:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20221215182339.129803-1-helgaas@kernel.org/
> >
> > This v2 is trivially rebased to v6.3-rc1 and the commit log expanded
> > slightly.
>
> This is an obvious and good cleanup patchset, who should I ping to ask
> for accepting? It's touching kexec generic code, while the hook
> only exists on x86 ARCH.
I grabbed them
Powered by blists - more mailing lists