[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230323040037.2389095-8-yosryahmed@google.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 04:00:37 +0000
From: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
Zefan Li <lizefan.x@...edance.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
Roman Gushchin <roman.gushchin@...ux.dev>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Vasily Averin <vasily.averin@...ux.dev>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-block@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, bpf@...r.kernel.org,
Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 7/7] memcg: do not modify rstat tree for zero updates
In some situations, we may end up calling memcg_rstat_updated() with a
value of 0, which means the stat was not actually updated. An example is
if we fail to reclaim any pages in shrink_folio_list().
Do not add the cgroup to the rstat updated tree in this case, to avoid
unnecessarily flushing it.
Signed-off-by: Yosry Ahmed <yosryahmed@...gle.com>
---
mm/memcontrol.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index 39a9c7a978ae..7afd29399409 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -618,6 +618,9 @@ static inline void memcg_rstat_updated(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int val)
{
unsigned int x;
+ if (!val)
+ return;
+
cgroup_rstat_updated(memcg->css.cgroup, smp_processor_id());
x = __this_cpu_add_return(stats_updates, abs(val));
--
2.40.0.rc1.284.g88254d51c5-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists