[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20230323063705.GA19800@varda-linux.qualcomm.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 12:07:06 +0530
From: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
CC: <agross@...nel.org>, <andersson@...nel.org>,
<konrad.dybcio@...aro.org>, <vkoul@...nel.org>,
<kishon@...nel.org>, <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
<krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<mturquette@...libre.com>, <sboyd@...nel.org>,
<quic_wcheng@...cinc.com>, <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-clk@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/8] dt-bindings: phy: qcom,qmp-usb: Add IPQ9574 USB3
PHY
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 10:52:44PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 22/03/2023 11:44, Varadarajan Narayanan wrote:
> > Add dt-bindings for USB3 PHY found on Qualcomm IPQ9574
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@...cinc.com>
> >
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Updated sections missed in previous patch
> > ---
> > .../bindings/phy/qcom,msm8996-qmp-usb3-phy.yaml | 22 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,msm8996-qmp-usb3-phy.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,msm8996-qmp-usb3-phy.yaml
> > index e81a382..beae44c 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,msm8996-qmp-usb3-phy.yaml
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/qcom,msm8996-qmp-usb3-phy.yaml
> > @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ properties:
> > enum:
> > - qcom,ipq6018-qmp-usb3-phy
> > - qcom,ipq8074-qmp-usb3-phy
> > + - qcom,ipq9574-qmp-usb3-phy
> > - qcom,msm8996-qmp-usb3-phy
> > - qcom,msm8998-qmp-usb3-phy
> > - qcom,qcm2290-qmp-usb3-phy
> > @@ -204,6 +205,27 @@ allOf:
> > compatible:
> > contains:
> > enum:
> > + - qcom,ipq9574-qmp-usb3-phy
> > + then:
> > + properties:
> > + clocks:
> > + maxItems: 2
>
> toplevel defines minItems as 3, so are you sure this works? Did you test it?
Yes, this is tested. Able to do I/O.
We only have 2 items. Is it ok change the minItems to 2?
Thanks
Varada
>
> Best regards,
> Krzysztof
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists