[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e8fa4f0e-7d06-2b8d-56e2-acfc05b8e886@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 15:43:19 +0800
From: Like Xu <like.xu.linux@...il.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/12] KVM: VMX: Refactor intel_pmu_set_msr() to align
with other set_msr() helpers
Hi Sean,
the kvm-x86/pmu branch is basically unchanged up to now,
do you need a V5 for this feature ? Thanks.
On 21/2/2023 4:44 pm, Like Xu wrote:
> On 17/2/2023 5:13 am, Sean Christopherson wrote:
>> Gah, I forgot to post a patch that gives intel_pmu_get_msr() the same treatment.
>> I'll replace this patch with the combined version below when applying, or will
>> post it separately if a v5 is needed.
>
> It's fine for me to apply this new patch first and then apply the remaining
> patches with only a tiny rebase effort (tests still remains healthy). More, if
> you have more comments on any other patches that need changing after
> the radio silence, please roar at me on this version.
>
>>
>> From: Sean Christopherson<seanjc@...gle.com>
>> Date: Thu, 26 Jan 2023 17:08:03 -0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: Refactor intel_pmu_{g,}set_msr() to align with
>> other helpers
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists