[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aa682e7d-3a0c-b820-9978-3f9eb00fbfda@collabora.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 09:21:21 +0100
From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...labora.com>
To: ye.xingchen@....com.cn, sergio.paracuellos@...il.com
Cc: lpieralisi@...nel.org, kw@...ux.com, robh@...nel.org,
bhelgaas@...gle.com, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PCI: mt7621: Use dev_err_probe()
Il 23/03/23 04:45, ye.xingchen@....com.cn ha scritto:
> From: Ye Xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
>
> Replace the open-code with dev_err_probe() to simplify the code.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ye Xingchen <ye.xingchen@....com.cn>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.c b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.c
> index 63a5f4463a9f..964de0e8c6a0 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/pcie-mt7621.c
> @@ -220,10 +220,9 @@ static int mt7621_pcie_parse_port(struct mt7621_pcie *pcie,
> }
>
> port->pcie_rst = of_reset_control_get_exclusive(node, NULL);
> - if (PTR_ERR(port->pcie_rst) == -EPROBE_DEFER) {
> - dev_err(dev, "failed to get pcie%d reset control\n", slot);
> - return PTR_ERR(port->pcie_rst);
> - }
> +
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(port->pcie_rst),
> + "failed to get pcie%d reset control\n", slot);
That's breaking this function. You're unconditionally returning.
I think that this is fine as it is, but if you really want to use dev_err_probe()
here, this could be...
ret = dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(port->pcie_rst), "failed ...." ...);
if (ret)
return ret;
Regards,
Angelo
>
> snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "pcie-phy%d", slot);
> port->phy = devm_of_phy_get(dev, node, name);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists