[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ZBwlLmPlBgC5tYTD@orome>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 11:08:46 +0100
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>
Cc: treding@...dia.com, krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org,
dmitry.osipenko@...labora.com, viresh.kumar@...aro.org,
rafael@...nel.org, jonathanh@...dia.com, robh+dt@...nel.org,
lpieralisi@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
mmaddireddy@...dia.com, kw@...ux.com, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
vidyas@...dia.com, sanjayc@...dia.com, ksitaraman@...dia.com,
ishah@...dia.com, bbasu@...dia.com
Subject: Re: [Patch v3 01/11] firmware: tegra: add function to get BPMP data
On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 11:54:31PM +0530, Sumit Gupta wrote:
> Add new function 'of_tegra_bpmp_get()' which can be
> used by other drivers like MC to get BPMP data without
> adding any property in respective drivers DT node.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sumit Gupta <sumitg@...dia.com>
> ---
> drivers/firmware/tegra/bpmp.c | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/soc/tegra/bpmp.h | 5 +++++
> 2 files changed, 43 insertions(+)
Sorry for not noticing this earlier, but can we not resolve the BPMP
using the existing tegra_bpmp_get()? That requires the presence of the
nvidia,bpmp property, but since we're adding new functionality here
that's not a problem.
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists