[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d2dd7d2c-8469-c3a9-5ecd-9c1a22caee2c@starfivetech.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 19:22:21 +0800
From: Jack Zhu <jack.zhu@...rfivetech.com>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
CC: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
"Todor Tomov" <todor.too@...il.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>,
"Jernej Skrabec" <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>,
Andrzej Pietrasiewicz <andrzejtp2010@...il.com>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl>,
"Eugen Hristev" <eugen.hristev@...labora.com>,
<linux-media@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <changhuang.liang@...rfivetech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/6] media: starfive: Add Starfive Camera Subsystem
driver
On 2023/3/22 1:56, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Jack,
>
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2023 at 08:56:34PM +0800, Jack Zhu wrote:
>> On 2023/3/12 20:43, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> > Hi Jack,
>> >
>> > Thank you for the patch.
>> >
>> > I'll do a partial review here as the patch is huge and I'm lacking time
>> > at the moment.
>>
>> Thank you for the review and your time.
>>
>> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2023 at 08:05:53PM +0800, Jack Zhu wrote:
>> >> Add the driver for Starfive Camera Subsystem found on
>> >> Starfive JH7110 SoC. It is used for handing image sensor
>> >> data.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Jack Zhu <jack.zhu@...rfivetech.com>
>> >> ---
>> >> drivers/media/platform/Kconfig | 1 +
>> >> drivers/media/platform/Makefile | 1 +
>> >> drivers/media/platform/starfive/Kconfig | 18 +
>> >> drivers/media/platform/starfive/Makefile | 14 +
>> >> drivers/media/platform/starfive/stf_camss.c | 728 +++++++++
>> >> drivers/media/platform/starfive/stf_camss.h | 104 ++
>> >> drivers/media/platform/starfive/stf_common.h | 149 ++
>> >> drivers/media/platform/starfive/stf_isp.c | 1079 ++++++++++++++
>> >> drivers/media/platform/starfive/stf_isp.h | 183 +++
>> >> .../media/platform/starfive/stf_isp_hw_ops.c | 1286 ++++++++++++++++
>> >> drivers/media/platform/starfive/stf_video.c | 1286 ++++++++++++++++
>> >> drivers/media/platform/starfive/stf_video.h | 89 ++
>> >> drivers/media/platform/starfive/stf_vin.c | 1314 +++++++++++++++++
>> >> drivers/media/platform/starfive/stf_vin.h | 194 +++
>> >> .../media/platform/starfive/stf_vin_hw_ops.c | 357 +++++
>> >> include/uapi/linux/stf_isp_ioctl.h | 127 ++
>> >> 16 files changed, 6930 insertions(+)
>> >> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/starfive/Kconfig
>> >> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/starfive/Makefile
>> >> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/starfive/stf_camss.c
>> >> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/starfive/stf_camss.h
>> >> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/starfive/stf_common.h
>> >> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/starfive/stf_isp.c
>> >> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/starfive/stf_isp.h
>> >> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/starfive/stf_isp_hw_ops.c
>> >> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/starfive/stf_video.c
>> >> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/starfive/stf_video.h
>> >> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/starfive/stf_vin.c
>> >> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/starfive/stf_vin.h
>> >> create mode 100644 drivers/media/platform/starfive/stf_vin_hw_ops.c
>> >> create mode 100644 include/uapi/linux/stf_isp_ioctl.h
>
> [snip]
>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/media/platform/starfive/stf_camss.c b/drivers/media/platform/starfive/stf_camss.c
>> >> new file mode 100644
>> >> index 000000000000..525f2d80c5eb
>> >> --- /dev/null
>> >> +++ b/drivers/media/platform/starfive/stf_camss.c
>> >> @@ -0,0 +1,728 @@
>
> [snip]
>
>> >> +/*
>> >> + * stfcamss_find_sensor - Find a linked media entity which represents a sensor
>> >> + * @entity: Media entity to start searching from
>> >> + *
>> >> + * Return a pointer to sensor media entity or NULL if not found
>> >> + */
>> >> +struct media_entity *stfcamss_find_sensor(struct media_entity *entity)
>> >
>> > From a camss point of view, the source is the csi2rx. You shouldn't
>> > need to access the sensor directly, only the csi2rx. If you think you
>> > have a need to access the sensor, please explain why and we can discuss
>> > it.
>>
>> need to use format and bpp of sensor to configure isp HW.
>
> You can obtain the same information from the ISP sink pad:
>
>
> +----------+ +------------+ +-----------+
> | | | | | |
> | Sensor [0| ----> |0] csi2rx [1| ----> |0] ISP |
> | | | | | |
> +----------+ +------------+ +-----------+
>
> (I'm not entirely sure if the csi2rx and ISP pad numbers are correct,
> but that's the idea.)
>
> The csi2rx can't modify the format (size and bpp), so the format on the
> sensor's pad 0, csi2rx pad 0, csi2rx pad 1 and ISP pad 0 must be
> identical.
>
> In isp_sensor_fmt_to_index(), the ISP driver doesn't need to get the
> format from the sensor, it can use the format on ISP pad 0 instead.
>
> In video_enum_framesizes(), the ISP driver shouldn't look at the format
> on the ISP input at all, it must enumerate all sizes that the video node
> supports, regardless of what is connected to its input.
>
> video_enum_frameintervals() should be dropped, the ISP itself has no
> notion of frame interval. Userspace can query and configure the frame
> rate from the sensor subdev directly.
>
> In video_pipeline_s_fmt(), the ISP driver shouldn't look at the format
> on the ISP input at all either. It must accept any format supported by
> the ISP. It's only when starting streaming that the pipeline is
> validated to make sure the formats configured on all subdevs match. I
> recommend reading https://git.ideasonboard.org/doc/mc-v4l2.git for an
> overview of how Media Controller-based drivers should behave. The
> documentation describes how the API is meant to be used from userspace,
> but the operating principles apply to driver development too.
>
> video_subscribe_event() and video_unsubscribe_event() should also be
> dropped, events from the sensor can be accessed by userspace on the
> sensor subdev directly.
>
> vin_set_stream() should call .s_stream() on the csi2rx, not the sensor.
> The csi2rx .s_stream() handler will forward the call to the sensor.
>
OK, will fix. Thank you for your comment.
>> >> +{
>> >> + struct media_pad *pad;
>> >> +
>> >> + while (1) {
>> >> + if (!entity->pads)
>> >> + return NULL;
>> >> +
>> >> + pad = &entity->pads[0];
>> >> + if (!(pad->flags & MEDIA_PAD_FL_SINK))
>> >> + return NULL;
>> >> +
>> >> + pad = media_pad_remote_pad_first(pad);
>> >> + if (!pad || !is_media_entity_v4l2_subdev(pad->entity))
>> >> + return NULL;
>> >> +
>> >> + entity = pad->entity;
>> >> +
>> >> + if (entity->function == MEDIA_ENT_F_CAM_SENSOR)
>> >> + return entity;
>> >> + }
>> >> +}
>
> [snip]
>
>> >> diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/stf_isp_ioctl.h b/include/uapi/linux/stf_isp_ioctl.h
>> >> new file mode 100644
>> >> index 000000000000..3f302ef235d2
>> >> --- /dev/null
>> >> +++ b/include/uapi/linux/stf_isp_ioctl.h
>> >> @@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
>
> [snip]
>
>> >> +enum _STF_ISP_IOCTL {
>> >
>> > Device-specific ioctls are allowed, but they must all be clearly
>> > documented.
>>
>> OK, I will add annotations for these ioctls.
>>
>> >
>> >> + STF_ISP_IOCTL_LOAD_FW = BASE_VIDIOC_PRIVATE + 1,
>> >
>> > Why can't you use the Linux kernel firmware API ?
>>
>> The ioctl is used for loading config file, it is different from
>> the Linux kernel firmware API. I will rename it.
>
> Could you explain what the config file is used for ?
used for debugging. It's not necessary. I will drop it.
>
>> >> + STF_ISP_IOCTL_DMABUF_ALLOC,
>> >> + STF_ISP_IOCTL_DMABUF_FREE,
>> >> + STF_ISP_IOCTL_GET_HW_VER,
>> >
>> > Not used, drop them.
>>
>> OK, will drop them.
>>
>> >
>> >> + STF_ISP_IOCTL_REG,
>> >
>> > Setting registers from userspace isn't allowed. No exception.
>>
>> OK, will fix.
>>
>> >
>> >> + STF_ISP_IOCTL_SHADOW_LOCK,
>> >> + STF_ISP_IOCTL_SHADOW_UNLOCK,
>> >> + STF_ISP_IOCTL_SHADOW_UNLOCK_N_TRIGGER,
>> >> + STF_ISP_IOCTL_SET_USER_CONFIG_ISP,
>> >
>> > I'm not sure what these ioctls do exactly as documentation is missing,
>> > but I don't think they are the right API. Please describe the problem
>> > you're trying to solve, and we'll find a good API.
>>
>> These were used for debugging, I will drop them. Thanks.
>>
>> >> + STF_ISP_IOCTL_MAX
>> >> +};
>
> [snip]
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists