[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04876110-1dec-dafd-cf4e-a6ed7a8b40b0@linaro.org>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 13:35:52 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...aro.org>
To: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>,
Peter Rosin <peda@...ntia.se>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@...aro.org>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 1/3] dt-bindings: i2c: Add Maxim MAX735x/MAX736x
variants
On 23/03/2023 12:53, Patrick Rudolph wrote:
> Update the pca954x bindings to add support for the Maxim MAX735x/MAX736x
> chips. The functionality will be provided by the exisintg pca954x driver.
>
> While on it make the interrupts support conditionally as not all of the
> existing chips have interrupts.
>
> For chips that are powered off by default add an optional regulator
> called vdd-supply.
>
> Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@...ements.com>
I just received this patch sent twice - as 1/3 and 1/4 - without
changelog, no cover letter, nothing more. Also other patches are
missing, but that I could understand as intentional.
This is confusing. New submission means new version. Attach changelog
after --- explaining the changes.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists