[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiq72nk+KSz6X0Lxg4kc_Bui=17XhboJ6q6j8gRg7Nsshziug@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Mar 2023 14:05:24 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Asahi Lina <lina@...hilina.net>
Cc: Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>,
Alex Gaynor <alex.gaynor@...il.com>,
Wedson Almeida Filho <wedsonaf@...il.com>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>, Gary Guo <gary@...yguo.net>,
Björn Roy Baron <bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, asahi@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] rust: ioctl: Add ioctl number manipulation functions
On Thu, Mar 23, 2023 at 1:34 PM Asahi Lina <lina@...hilina.net> wrote:
>
> Changes in v3:
> - Actually made the change intended in v2.
> - Link to v2: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230224-rust-ioctl-v2-1-5325e76a92df@asahilina.net
>
> Changes in v2:
> - Changed from assert!() to build_assert!() (static_assert!() can't work
> here)
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230224-rust-ioctl-v1-1-5142d365a934@asahilina.net
It seems `#[inline(always)]` got added to a few of those, right? (The
addition looks fine to me, but just to understand if is it an omission
in the changelog, or an unintended change, or intended for another
reason).
Thanks!
Cheers,
Miguel
Powered by blists - more mailing lists